top of page

Acerca de la NTG

Artículos de relevancia

Studies of dementia symptoms.png

de Medeiros, K., Robert, P., Gauthier, S., Stella, F., Politis, A., Leoutsakos, J., Taragano, F., Kremer, J., Brugnolo, A., Porsteinsson, AP, Geda, YE, Brodaty, H., Gazdag, G., Cummings, J. y Lyketsos, C. (2010).La escala de calificación del clínico-inventario neuropsiquiátrico (NPI-C): confiabilidad y validez de una evaluación revisada de los síntomas neuropsiquiátricos en la demencia.Psicogeriatría internacional, 22(6), 984–994.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610210000876

​

Los síntomas neuropsiquiátricos (SNP) afectan a casi todos los pacientes con demencia y son un foco importante de estudio y tratamiento. La evaluación precisa de NPS a través de medidas válidas, sensibles y confiables es crucial. Aunque las medidas NPS actuales tienen muchos puntos fuertes, también tienen algunas limitaciones (p. ej., la adquisición de datos se limita a los informantes o cuidadores como encuestados, profundidad limitada de elementos específicos para la demencia moderada). Por lo tanto, desarrollamos una versión revisada del NPI, conocida como NPI-C. El NPI-C incluye dominios y elementos ampliados, y una metodología de calificación clínica. Este estudio evaluó la confiabilidad y la validez convergente del NPI-C en diez sitios internacionales (siete idiomas). La validez facial para 78 ítems nuevos se obtuvo a través de un panel Delphi. Un total de 128 díadas (cuidadores/pacientes) de tres categorías de gravedad de la demencia (leve = 58, moderada = 49, grave = 21) fueron entrevistados por separado por dos calificadores capacitados utilizando dos métodos de calificación: la entrevista NPI original y una entrevista calificada por un médico. método. El evaluador 1 también administró cuatro medidas establecidas adicionales: la escala de evaluación de apatía, la escala de calificación psiquiátrica breve, el índice de agitación de Cohen-Mansfield y la escala de Cornell para la depresión en la demencia. Se utilizaron correlaciones intraclase para determinar la fiabilidad entre evaluadores. Las correlaciones de Pearson entre los cuatro dominios relevantes de NPI-C y sus medidas externas correspondientes se utilizaron para la validez convergente. La confiabilidad entre evaluadores fue fuerte para la mayoría de los ítems. La validez convergente fue de moderada (apatía y agitación) a fuerte (alucinaciones y delirios, agitación y vocalización aberrante y depresión) para las calificaciones de los médicos en los dominios NPI-C.  En general, el NPI-C se muestra prometedor como una herramienta versátil que puede medir con precisión el NPS y que utiliza un sistema de escala uniforme para facilitar las comparaciones de datos entre estudios.

click on image to open PDF

Otros recursos para profesionales

Look for change, describe the change, and track the change over time. A pattern of progressive change across behavior, cognition, communication, everyday functioning, or physical abilities provides much more useful information for assessment than any isolated behavior.

​

​          Dementia can occur in adults with intellectual disability who do not have Down syndrome, although the causes, age of onset, and pattern of symptoms vary considerably. As in other adults, Alzheimer disease may be responsible, but other forms and causes of dementia also occur. Because a person may already have lifelong limitations in memory, communication, reasoning, or everyday skills, the most important indication of possible dementia is usually a sustained change from that person's previous abilities and behavior rather than performance against population norms.

​

          Early changes are not limited to forgetfulness. Families and support staff may first notice increasing difficulty completing familiar tasks, poorer attention or concentration, loss of previously established skills, greater confusion, changes in communication or language, reduced initiative, or difficulty organizing and carrying out activities. Behavioral changes can include new apathy or withdrawal, irritability, anxiety, depressed mood, agitation, restlessness, altered sleep, changes in eating, repetitive behavior, aggression, or other behavior that is unusual for the individual. As dementia progresses, changes may become apparent in self-care, continence, mobility, gait, eating and drinking, social engagement, and dependence on others for everyday activities. The particular pattern varies with the person, severity and cause of intellectual disability, and type of dementia.

​

          No single behavioral change establishes that dementia is present. Pain, depression or anxiety, sensory impairment, sleep disorders, medication effects, seizures, infection or other illness, and changes in living or social circumstances can produce similar changes. A new behavior should therefore be treated as information to investigate, not automatically as a symptom of dementia. What becomes particularly concerning is a pattern of changes that persists or progresses and represents a clear departure from the person's established baseline.

​

Recording and Tracking Changes

​

          For adults with ID, longitudinal observation is especially valuable. Family members and support staff who know the person well may notice changes that are not apparent during a brief medical appointment. Research also suggests that behavioral and functional changes can be harder for caregivers to recognize in people with more limited verbal abilities, making systematic observation particularly important.

​

          Rather than simply recording that someone is "more confused," "aggressive," or "not himself," caregivers should document what has actually changed, when it began, how often it occurs, its severity, and whether it is affecting everyday functioning. It is also useful to record the circumstances surrounding a behavior—where and when it occurs, what happened beforehand, how the person responded, and whether there have been simultaneous changes in health, medication, sleep, staffing, residence, or daily routine. A simple dated log maintained over several weeks or months can reveal a pattern that might otherwise be missed.

​

          Periodic use of an informant-based dementia screening instrument designed for adults with intellectual disability can provide a more structured record. Tools such as the NTG-Early Detection Screen for Dementia (NTG-EDSD), Dementia Questionnaire for People with Learning Disabilities (DLD), and Dementia Screening Questionnaire for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities (DSQIID) are designed to capture change reported by someone familiar with the individual; such tools complement rather than replace clinical assessment. Reviews of ID-specific instruments particularly support informant-based approaches for following cognitive, behavioral, and functional change over time.

​

​

bottom of page